Mark wrote: > Gary,
>> I found it interesting that 2.4.2 did not croak when I added >> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps => undef, to the policy bank. I can >> add arbitrarily named items and amavisd-new won't complain (not that >> it necessarily should). The only obvious issue with that would be if >> someone misspelled a setting, they wouldn't know it. > Not sure what you mean. A warning is issued at the highest syslog level > (same with 2.4.2 as in 2.4.3): > (19414-01) (!) loading policy bank "MYNETS": > unknown field "spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps" > (19414-01) (!) loading policy bank "MYNETS": > unknown field "allowed_added_header_fields" > Mark Ok, I didn't look in the logs. It does complain, but I was expecting it to die - not that it should. I was simply surprised it did not. Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
