Jef, > The high number of messages with "autolearn=no" is probably explained in > you link (e.g. already learned or too few body/header points). > I'm sure some of my messages are not scanned by SA for the reasons you > mention. But I almost can't believe that explains all my 'missing' > messages. At least the autolearning is working, but not as much as I was > expecting...
The last time I checked (last week) almost all the missing "autolearn=..." were due to a cached result, as the same spam contents was hitting lots of our recipients. Increase the $log_levels and search for: "spam_presence cached, skipping spam_scan" (at loglevel 5). Also the absence of "SA check:" in a TIMING report at log level 2 indicates the SA was not called. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
