Cian Davis wrote: > mouss wrote on 22/07/07 18:20: > >> Will said "virus lover" pay for the consequences when his machine >> infects the rest of the world? viruses are different than spam. They are >> digital "massive destruction weapons". >> >> > > I understand the argument against delivering viruses to our users, but > they expect their mail to come to them untampered, regardless (or at > least the bodies). We can add the tools to let them identify virus > infected mails but it's up to them to do whatever. I would just like it > clearer that the message is virus-infected. >
but you understand that they can get infected without "opening" the message, right? > > As far as I know, the "$defang_virus = 1" will change the body so isn't > really an option for us. > > If you use maildrop or procmail then you can alter the subject there (formail or reformail). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
