Gary V wrote: > So, as mentioned, you have two options. You can either NULL out this > field for this particular policy, or you can add a new policy (I would > suggest setting only the id, policy_name and spam_lover fields and > leave all the other fields at their default NULL value)
Shouldn't we bypass_spam_checks ? Seems like a waste of CPU when we know that it's really spam. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance ... net philanthropy, open source and other randomness ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
