On 8/20/07, Jordi Espasa Clofent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For some reason I'm stuggling with this too. At log_level 5 I get: > > > > Aug 20 11:45:21 mail amavis[1104]: (01104-01) skipping banned check: > > no applicable lookup tables > > Aug 20 11:45:21 mail amavis[1104]: (01104-01) banned check: any=0, all=N (1) > > > > and mail passes clean. > > Indeed the code I've posted is extracted from your excelent docs > available at: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/ (thanks Gary ;)) > > I've checked the syntax and it seems ok. In fact, log shows that mails > are filtered under Amavisd-new, but banned rule doesn't work properly. > > At log_level 5 I get exactly the same message aqs you. > > :S > > Maybe Mark will answer it... > > -- > Thanks, > Jordi Espasa Clofent >
That particular sample I took directly from: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#pbanks-ex I have not tested extensively, but it does not seem to pay any attention to anything I place in banned_filename_maps -- Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
