On Fri, November 16, 2007 5:29 am, Noel Jones wrote: > Voytek Eymont wrote:
> I used something similar a couple years ago with a WARN and > found it hit nearly equal amounts of ham and spam. So not an accurate > predictor of spam at that time at that time, and I quit using it. > > SpamAssassin would be the right place for something like this > if you want to continue using it, but only at a very low point value. Noel, thanks for confirming, that matches with my observation -- Voytek ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
