On 3/27/08, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gary V wrote: > > Another thing to consider. Depending on your default kill_level and > > your quarantine setup, spam that is passed to recipients in > > @spam_lovers_maps may also have a copy of the message sent to > > quarantine. Assuming one is using default static lookups, consider > > also creating a @spam_kill_level_maps where the spam lovers are given > > a high kill_level (which prevents quarantine), e.g.: > > Well, yes, high kill level does disable quarantine (because spam level > never reaches a high kill level, so mail is never considered spam and > quarantining does not apply), but it also makes spam_lovers redundant, > as mail is never considered spam, so there is no need to bother with > spam_lovers, mail will be delivered normally. > > So setting kill level high to some recipients achieves both: they will > receive mail (same as spam_lovers), and no spam quarantining takes place > (same as disabling quarantine for these users).
But what if you have one recipient in a @bypass_spam_checks_maps and another that is not? Would you still not need to place the recipient in the @bypass_spam_checks_maps in the @spam_lovers_maps? -- Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
