> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giampaolo Tomassoni > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 7:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Rule evaluation order > > > ...omissis... > > > > Instead, for most cases it should suffice to keep the > > dsn_cutoff_level values reasonably low. If such new undetected > > viruses would collect enough spam points to exceed the cutoff level > > (even if it were also blocked as banned), the non-delivery > notification > > would be suppressed due to high spam score. > > Pardon me, Mark, but I wasn't even aware of the dsn_cutoff_level > thingery... > > This sounds very interesting to me.
Well, this works only for sender and recipient DSN, right? The banned_admin would still be notified, right? Otherwise I don't know why I got nots of banned content having an X-Spam-Score of 11, while my sa_dsn_cutoff_level is 10... Thanks, Giampaolo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
