On Freitag, 27. Juni 2008 David Schweikert wrote: > I use amavisd-milter with postfix and it works very well. I did it so > that I could implement pre-queue filtering efficiently: it has the > big advantage that you can have 200 postfix smtpd processes, 1 > amavisd-milter and (for example) 5 amavisd. Otherwise, with the > smtpd_proxy_filter setup, you would also need 200 amavisd...
Are there any side effects with this? Currently I use post-queue amavis, but I've heard several times now that pre-queue is better for high throughput. Are the 5 amavisd for post-queue, or what? I don't understand the concept, why it is more effective. I know that I would need 200 amavisd with post-queue, but why not with pre-queue? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
