On 4/22/10 11:24 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> If this serves only as an approximate decision, I believe it would
> not make much difference if kill level and required_hits are close
> but not exactly of the same value.
>
>
so in theory, if local.cf had required_score 5.0, the call to the SA pm
would be able to compare the score it just computed vs the 5.0 and give
an reasonable answer.
The reason this is important in a 'post queue' DCC installation like SA
or amavisd is that the 'normal' DCC operation would be reporting emails
as they come in, so that this makes DCC an automatic, no human
intervention needed, obsolutly no FP 'bulk email' detector.
(note: its not a no FP spam detector, bulk isn't always spam, spam isn't
always bulk).
It also helps the 'problems' with DCC wanting you to whitelist all your
bulk providers. Impossible if you have users involved!
New DCC.pm that Vernon is working on cleans up some things, and fixes a
problem with a stale dcc socket.
I would like to see about it being considered for 3.3.2.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
