--On Friday, June 10, 2011 6:39 PM +0200 Mark Martinec
<[email protected]> wrote:
Wow, that's interesting, and generally I'd expect a C library to be
significantly faster than a pure perl module. I wonder why it's so slow.
It's probably not that slow. It's just that perl excells in
processing and I/O on large strings with few operations.
The Mail::DKIM and amavisd are optimized to take advantage of it.
Ok, good point.
:/ Have you passed this on to the author? They sure seemed
to feel their module was significantly faster. :P
I haven't - (although I remember Vivek Khera and his valuable
presence on the Postfix ML ever since 2004, and even on the
amavis list). Feel free to do so if you wish.
Which version of Mail::OpenDKIM you used in the test would also be useful
information. :)
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
