On 6/19/11, jason hirsh wrote: >#blacklist test > # soft-blacklisting (positive score) > '[email protected]' => 4.0, > > here is what I am getting before debug > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.092 required=6.31 tests=[AM:BOOST=4, > BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham >
Clearly shows that you got your 4 points for soft blacklist. Bayes gives you -1.9 posssibly because you have not sent yourself anything other than ham. AM:BOOST=4, BAYES_00=-1.9 If you mail from this address to score higher than 6.31, you would need to increase the blacklist to something more like 9.0 >the maillog showed this whihc lloks like it found the address but didn't total >the score Your log shows the blacklist was applied. It's the -1.9 that offset your total score. It does show in both places that your total score was 2.092, which is well below 6.31. Jun 19 19:35:43 tuna amavis[84064]: (84064-01) wbl: soft-blacklisted (4) sender <[email protected]> => <[email protected]>, recip_key="." Jun 19 19:35:44 tuna amavis[84064]: (84064-01) SPAM-TAG, <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, No, score=2.092 required=6.31 tests=[AM:BOOST=4, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham -- Gary V
