Hi, >> > No, the DKIM_VERIFIED (or rather: DKIM_VALID, as it is now called) >> Shouldn't then L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL be updated to rely upon DKIM_VALID >> instead of the deprecated DKIM_VERIFIED? > > Yes, definitely, if still in use. Where did you find it, it's not > one of the stock rules. Probably posted (possibly by me) a long time ago.
It's gone now, so I suspect it was deleted by the recent rules update. Thanks for the info on adsp_override. Looks like some awesome stuff. Thanks, Alex
