* Steve <[email protected]>:
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:44:54 +0200
> > Von: Mark Martinec <[email protected]>
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: Re: amavisd-new 2.7.2 vs 2.8.0:?
> 
> > Quanah,
> > 
> >  > I'm kind of curious as to whether or not 0MQ is dead.
> >  > I've filed multiple bug reports with them with zero feedback.
> >  > <https://github.com/lestrrat/p5-ZMQ/issues?state=open>
> > 
> > Don't know, I hope it's not dead, there have been releases
> > since the fork.
> > 
> > But since the fork of a 0MQ project into a Crossroads I/O,
> > with two main developers actively continuing their work there,
> > seems to me the other one has a better prospect. Time will tell.
> > 
> > 
> > On 2012-07-07 10:53, Steve wrote:
> > > You don't know Quanah! When he wants something then he wants it to be
> > done/ready yesterday.
> > 
> > :)
> > 
> > Quanah has been very patient with me dragging my feet regarding
> > improving LDAP support. Appreciated.
> > 
> Well... I see him often nagging/(requesting) on the dspam mailing list for 
> ipv6 support. Last time he even sent a bunch of links for how to implement 
> ipv6 into c code. Funny. When I read it I asked my self: he took the time to 
> find documentation what needs to be added/changed in c code for ipv6 code (in 
> addition to ipv4 code) and this is not the first time he is asking for that 
> on the list. And so far no one of the community has made anything. And this 
> guy works for EMC/VMware where a gazillion of coders are working and he can 
> not provide a small patch adding that ipv6 support that he is claiming to be 
> easy to add? Is the community not supposed to work that way, that everyone is 
> contributing as much as they can?

You do it yourself, you pay someone else or you wait until someone does it
when that persons thinks the time is right.

p@rick

-- 
All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the
list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and
justified.

saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH):
<http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>

Reply via email to