Hi! On Friday 06 September 2013 23:21:04 Patrick Ben Koetter via amavis-users wrote: > As a result to the ongoing debate about NSA, Prism etc. the number of > notifictations we get for "undecipherable" mails we get is rising. People > are starting to use PGP more often.
Really? Interesting :-) > amavis classifies PGP encrypted message bodies as undecipherable, but lets > S/MIME crypted message bodies pass without any note. Hum. I'm not sure, I made the same observation. I'll have to test this again. > That's annoying, because I keep getting all those notifications about > totally legitimate mail. > > I'd expect consistent behaviour - no matter which - for each methods that > crypt a message body. I would, too. > Personally I'd want to have a contents_category of its own for all > "encrypted" mail, be it PGP, S/MIME or any other technology that creates > crypted the message bodies. > > @Marc: Do you think you can add such or have S/MIME treated just like PGP > mail? May I jump in with the following reference[1], hoping for the unexpected event of the first answer to my RFC patch? :-) I would love to have it (or a similar solution) in a released amavis. Cheers Carsten [1] http://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/2013-April/002268.html
