On Saturday, November 29, 2014 05:26:43 PM Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Thomas Spuhler <[email protected]>: > > On Saturday, November 29, 2014 04:31:32 PM Markus Schönhaber wrote: > > > Am 29.11.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Thomas Spuhler: > > > >> On 29. nov. 2014 14.34.30 Carsten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 503) > > > >>> line 1. > > > > > > > > Strange, I got is last night the first time (Mageia) and I didn't do a > > > > spamassassin upgrade. > > > > > > The problem isn't caused by a SpamAssassin upgrade but by some rules > > > coming from the spamassassin.org update channel. > > > > There seems to be some disagreement on this. Benny Pederson wrote it > > differently. > > One of the rules, AFAIK 72_...?, causes the problem. > > > And BTW I am not using spamassassin for filtering but the spam part > > embedded in amavisd. > > This leads to the conclusion, it's the rules. > > The spam part in amavis _is_ spamassassin unless you have configured something > else. > > p@rick
You are right. Let me rephrase it, I am not using spamd/spamc -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
