Citēts Jānis <[email protected]>
Sun, 07 Jul 2019 00:07:51 +0300:

Hi!

I have a strange problem with amavis:

some tests are taking extreeemly long time:

Jul 6 23:48:52 server.fqdn /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[17773]: (17773-03) size: 16137, TIMING [total 119977 ms] - SMTP greeting: 2.9 (0%)0 , SMTP EHLO: 2.0 (0%)0, SMTP pre-MAIL: 1.2 (0%)0, SMTP MAIL: 2.2 (0%)0, SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 178 (0%)0, SMTP DATA: 354 (0%)0, check_init: 0.9 (0%)0, digest_hdr: 3.7 (0%)0, digest_body_dkim: 22 (0%)0, collect_info: 4.8 (0%)0, mime_decode: 21 (0%)0, get-file-type2: 134 (0%)1, parts_dec ode: 0.6 (0%)1, check_header: 1.4 (0%)1, AV-scan-1: 7010 (6%)6, AV-scan-2: 111634 (93%)99, AV-scan-3: 0.1 (0%)99, spam-wb-list: 3.8 (0%)99, SA msg read: 0.6 (0%)100, SA parse: 6 (0%)100, SA check: 358 (0%)100, decide_mail_destiny: 8 (0%)100, notif-quar: 0.5 (0%)100, fwd-connect: 40 ( 0%)100, fwd-xforward: 1.0 (0%)100, fwd-mail-pip: 9 (0%)100, fwd-rcpt-pip: 0.4 (0%)100, fwd-data-chkpnt: 0.1 (0%)100, write-header: 1.1 (0%)100 , fwd-data-contents: 0.3 (0%)100, fwd-end-chkpnt: 152 (0%)100, prepare-dsn: 1.8 (0%)100, report: 2.5 (0%)100, main_log_entry: 12 (0%)100, upda te_snmp: 3.5 (0%)100, SMTP pre-response: 0.6 (0%)100, SMTP response: 0.6 (0%)100, unlink-2-files: 0.7 (0%)100, rundown: 1.2 (0%)100

(especially - AV-scan-2: 111634 (93%)

and - as a result - sending server does not receive timely acceptance and interrupts transmission. The message is sent repeatedly over and over

Jul 6 23:48:52 server.fqdn /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[17773]: (17773-03) SMTP session over, timer stopped Jul 6 23:48:52 server.fqdn /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[17773]: (17773-03) ESMTP: notice: client broke the connection without a QUIT ()

What this AV-scan-2 represents? may be it is some problem with clamav (0.101.2) - on servers with older one I do not observe such delays.

It seems i found the problem - in the cfg file there was a wrong reference to clamd.sock which in my case is clamd.socket, so amavis fell over to fallback routine which is much more CPU and time intense.

Now it flies again!

Janis


Reply via email to