Hi Vikram, Thank you very much for your response. I am looking forward to its release. Is there any design documents for Ambari-186?
By the way, is the code in trunk usable right now? I mean, does it work? Best, Deniz On Jun 7, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Vikram Dixit wrote: > Hi Deniz, > > Your observation is right. Ambari-186 is completely different from trunk. > Hopefully it will replace it. > > Regardless, I am of the opinion that this tree should be ready for > consumption in 2-3 weeks. We are currently stabilizing this code base. > > Thank you for your interest. > > Regards > Vikram. > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Deniz Demir wrote: > >> I am still hoping a response to the following questions. I am also curious >> for the time table for the first release. >> >> Thanks, >> Deniz >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:59 PM, Deniz Demir wrote: >> >>> It looks like Ambari-186 is completely different from what is in the trunk. >>> Do you mean it will replace what is currently in trunk? Or does it work >>> with or on top of trunk code? >>> >>> I mean, what is the relationship between trunk and ambari-186 branch? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Deniz >>> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Vitthal Suhas Gogate wrote: >>> >>>> Ambari-186 should be in a working state soon. Its actively developed and >>>> tested at Hortonworks. Once it is working, I plan to propose merging it >>>> with trunk resolving some architectural differences before making the first >>>> Ambari release. >>>> >>>> --Suhas >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Deniz Demir <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to understand Ambari and its code base, and I think I am a >>>>> little confused. "trunk" is 5 months old, and all activity seems to be in >>>>> branch-186, under hmc. I am wondering whether Ambari design got changed >>>>> compared with what is described in the "High-level Design" section of the >>>>> home page. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Deniz >>>>> >>> >> >
