+1 looked at the source and licenses. Looks good to go. thanks mahadev
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Yusaku Sako <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > I was able to build/install the Ambari RPMs and deploy a 10-node RHEL5 > cluster without any issues. I used the tarball from > http://people.apache.org/~vikram/ambari-0.9-incubating-rc0/. > > Yusaku > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Varun Kapoor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Nicely done, Vikram! > > > > /V > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Matt Foley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Vitthal "Suhas" Gogate < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > Thanks Vikram! > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > >> > > >> > On Jul 4, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Vikram Dixit <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi All, > >> > > > >> > > I have created a ambari-0.9-incubating-rc0 release candidate. This > work > >> > is a complete re-write of the earlier code and warranted a big jump in > >> the > >> > version number. Also, we are close enough to a 1.0 and should be able > to > >> > make a 1.0 release soon. However, given that the current trunk is very > >> > usable and supports a number of features, we have the 0.9 as a stable > >> > playing ground before 1.0. The following artifacts up for a vote: > >> > > > >> > > SVN source tag (r1357402) > >> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/branches/branch-0.9/ > >> > > > >> > > Staging site: > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~vikram/ambari-0.9-incubating-rc0/ > >> > > > >> > > PGP release keys (signed using 876EF43B) > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/branches/branch-0.9/KEYS > >> > > > >> > > One can look into the issues fixed in this release at > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12321561 > >> > > > >> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > >> > > > >> > > [ ] +1 approve > >> > > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > > > >> > > Clearly I am +1. > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Vikram > >> > > >> >
