[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13804450#comment-13804450
 ] 

Trevor McKay commented on AMBARI-3585:
--------------------------------------

Hmm, I am not convinced that the sqlite stuff is even used.  Default seems to 
be derby and postgres.  Do we need it at all?  Should we remove 
JDBCProviderModule, DBHelper, and SQLiteConnectionFactory?

> Allow the SQLite.JDBCDriver to load as an alternative to org.sqlite.jdbc
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-3585
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-3585
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: controller
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.1
>         Environment: Fedora/RHEL
>            Reporter: Trevor McKay
>            Assignee: Trevor McKay
>         Attachments: sqlite.patch
>
>
> On Fedora/RHEL/CentOS, the javasqlite JDBC driver is packaged as part of the 
> base system while the xerial sqlite-jdbc driver is not.
> To facilitate packaging in Fedora and maintain current behavior for rpms 
> built via maven, allow SQLiteConncetionFactory to load the 
> "SQLite.JDBCDriver" class if loading "org.sqlite.jdbc" fails.
> If both fail, report the original exception (class not found for 
> org.sqlite.jdbc)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to