On 27/06/2010 15:58, David Jencks wrote:
> <mentor>Are you sure you want to continue this discussion with a vote at this 
> point?  It's OK to have votes about anything you want :-) but.... they tend 
> to be polarizing and end up with a losing side who may not be happy.  I think 
> that trying to get a consensus on design decisions through discussion is 
> often a better route.</mentor>
> 
> <interested party>  I don't understand the details of this proposal.  Could 
> someone come up with a realistic example showing how the "same" OAuth message 
> would be sent using annotations, and not using annotations, and what would 
> happen internally to this information?  It might be obvious to anyone who 
> knows anything about oauth but  would help me out a lot </interested party>

What form would you like the example in, pseudo-code or written description?


p

> thanks
> david jencks
> 
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> I'm here to call a new vote to define our design direction. Some
>> threads ago on this ML, Pid and I were discussing about the use, or
>> not, of Java metadata Annotations to enhance OAuth messages and
>> tokens.
>>
>> Pros:
>> * marshallers/unmarshallers to/from strings could be auto-generated
>> using the APT;
>> * the calculation of the base string (just an example) is parameter agnostic.
>>
>> Cons:
>> * not so hard writing parsers (JavaCC? AntLR? XText?) and serializers;
>> * not so hard writing the base string algorithm
>>
>> So please cast your votes in favor of
>>
>> [] Pro Annotations
>> [] Cons Annotations
>>
>> The vote will stay open for the next 72 hours. It would be nice if the
>> choice comes with a justification, so everybody can take care about
>> someone else's considerations.
>>
>> My vote if
>>
>> [X] Pro Annotations
>>
>> I already implemented the base string calculus based only on metadata
>> discovery and I didn't take care about the parameter retrieving
>> criteria. I'd love to have a choice to see Annotations in action on
>> compile-time :P
>>
>> Cheers, have a nice weekend,
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to