2011/10/25 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> > Thanks Scot!! > > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: > > > > > On 25 Oct 2011, at 08:43, Antonio Sanso wrote: > > > >> Hi *, > >> > >> thanks for the feedbacks. > >> As said, I am really keen to contribute and I'd try to do as much as I > can. > >> @Lukasz, thanks for the hints about the build. I have succeeded to build > the oauth-2.0 project (it turned out I had, as expected, a local issue). > >> On the same topic I was also wondering if there is any plan to setup any > continuos integration environment (e.g. Jenkins) for Amber, or if it exists > already. > > > > Its listed here: > > > > https://builds.apache.org/ > > > > Reason of my doubt was due here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/amber/integration.html > > So this might be a good occasion to update this page :) > > correct, it's just we need to specify our CI url inside the Maven POM. Thanks Antonio for your nice effort. Tommaso
> Regards > > Antonio > > >> Should not, I might also here. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Antonio > >> > >> On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Łukasz Moreń wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Apologize for the late answer but I was busy at the conference last > week. > >>> > >>> Antonio, yes it currently implements draft-10 of the specification and > the > >>> plan is to update it to the newest draft. > >>> Could you specify what is the reason of these tests failure? To build > Amber > >>> maven 3 is required. It builds successfully on my machine, as well as > on > >>> Apache CI [1]. > >>> > >>> That's great to see more and more issues with new features in jira > coming > >>> from new people.:) > >>> > >>> [1] https://builds.apache.org/ > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Lukasz Moren > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Great to hear from you. > >>>> > >>>> I'm starting from simple ones. Two patches are created under AMBER-34 > and > >>>> AMBER-35. > >>>> > >>>> At this point, I'm building a prototype with Amber to create an oAuth > 2.0 > >>>> provider. In addition to the latest spec conformance, I'm also keen to > >>>> define the SPIs for oAuth 2.0 provider so that we can plug in the > back-end > >>>> services to deal with client registration, > authentication/authorization, and > >>>> token management. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Raymond > >>>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>>> Raymond Feng > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> Apache Software Foundation Member > >>>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >>>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >>>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >>>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>>> > >>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>> > >>>>> sorry as I've been away the whole last week, both of you are welcomed > to > >>>>> contribute here and it'd be cool to switch to the latest spe, > especially > >>>> in > >>>>> order to make the first release. > >>>>> I'll have a quick tour on Jira to see if there are already available > >>>> patches > >>>>> (and looking forward for new ones) :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks guys and hope to help you contributing to Amber. > >>>>> Tommaso > >>>>> > >>>>> 2011/10/20 Raymond Feng <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, Antonio. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm interested in the latest oAuth 2.0 spec implementation using > Amber > >>>> too. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You should be able to earn your karma by contributing as you have > >>>> already > >>>>>> started. Committers on this project should help you out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unfortunately, I'm not a committer on this project yet. But I would > like > >>>> to > >>>>>> help the project move forward. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Raymond > >>>>>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>> Raymond Feng > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> Apache Software Foundation Member > >>>>>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >>>>>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >>>>>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >>>>>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Oct 20, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Anyone :)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Antonio > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Begin forwarded message: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> From: Antonio Sanso <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>> Date: October 17, 2011 1:28:23 PM GMT+02:00 > >>>>>>> To: "[email protected]<mailto: > >>>>>> [email protected]>" <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto: > >>>>>> [email protected]>> > >>>>>>> Subject: oauth-2.0 project > >>>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto: > >>>>>> [email protected]>" <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto: > >>>>>> [email protected]>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi *, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> first of all great job. I think Amber is a great starting point for > >>>>>> whoever is looking for a framework to implement a compliant > OAuth(2) > >>>>>> client/server. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd have a couple of questions though and I'd highly appreciate if > >>>>>> anybody from the Amber community may answer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1. The Oauth2 implementation seems to be stucked to version 10 of > the > >>>>>> specification. Am I correct? Is there any plan to upgrade the > >>>> implementation > >>>>>> in order to be on > >>>>>>> synch with the spec (that is currently v. 22)? > >>>>>>> If yes, I'd be willing to help with Jira issues (I have already > >>>> created > >>>>>> few of them), patches and possibly (if you'd accept me one day as a > >>>>>> committer) with standard commits. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2. If I try to build tha oauth-2.0 project using maven it fails due > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Failed tests: > >>>>>>> testBuildJSON(org.apache.amber.oauth2.common.utils.JSONUtilsTest) > >>>>>>> testBuildJSON(org.apache.amber.oauth2.common.OAuthUtilsTest) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is this a known issue or I have to adapt my environment to a > particular > >>>>>> maven version? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks in advance > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Antonio > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > >
