Hi Andrew,

I am not sure if it solve your case, but maybe you could try to implement
your own HttpServletRequestWrapper, fill it with data you get from
non-servlet environment and pass it to the Amber library.

Cheers, Lukasz

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andrew
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Andrew Akira Toulouse wrote:
>
> > Apologies for the late reply; it seems that my email wasn't included
> > in the return email.
> >
> > Play's servlet wrapper is a compatibility layer for when it is
> > deployed from tomcat. However, the primary mode of use is as a
> > stand-alone server, which allows it to do nifty things such as
> > websockets and asynchronous request handling (not unlike Node.js only
> > built on top of a more...rigorous language). So no, this isn't an
> > option, unfortunately. It's somewhat of an unconventional choice - so
> > far - as far as Java web applications go, but it has strong support
> > from Typesafe and Scala community support is growing. It's also in use
> > at Klout, supported on Heroku, and seems on a trajectory that doesn't
> > end in obscurity. Unfortunately, by eschewing use of the servlet
> > abstraction, it does exclude itself from useful modules tailored to
> > the Servlet API.
> >
> > Is amber modularized enough that compatibility for a non-Servlet API
> > request/response object could be written in without too much trouble?
>
> as long as I can see at the moment a log of method signatures have a
> dependency on Servlet API.
> If I do not completely wrong (here on of the committer might help) Amber-3
> [0] might help here if applied also to Amber Oauth2 project.
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBER-3
>
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> starting from point I do not know Play at all wouldn't be easier to use
> the SERVLET_REQ provided
> >> from the framework ? [0]
> >>
> >> Apologies if I am totally wrong, just my 2 cents
> >>
> >> [0]
> http://www.playframework.org/documentation/api/1.2.4/play%2Fserver%2FServletWrapper.html
>
>

Reply via email to