Hi Pid On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:29 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 28/06/2012 16:04, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >> 2012/6/27 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi Raymond, >>> >>> as long as I know Tommaso will take care of the release process. >>> >> >> correct, I'll do it. >> >> >>> Apologies if I haven't been enough clear with the subject. The vote itself >>> is for the release version and new SNAPSHOT trunk version. > > Sorry - we are voting to release what, the latest trunk? > > I'm +1 for going ahead with a release, but can we really vote on an > incomplete set of release artifacts? we have moved the old 1.0 implementation to attic (see AMBER-55) and arguably what we have for OAuth2.0 is relatively stable. WDYT? Regards Antonio > > > p > >> +1 >> >> Tommaso >> >> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> For an Apache release, we typically need to have binary/source >>> distributions and maven artifacts. Do you know how to produce them? We'll >>> need to vote on them. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Raymond >>>> >>>> On Jun 27, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi *, >>>>> >>>>> as you might have noticed Tommaso fixed AMBER-55 (thanks!!) so we are >>> finally ready for our first release!! >>>>> >>>>> The idea is to release amber-0.22-incubating (as we should be compliant >>> with version 22 of the spec) and having trunk as >>> amber-0.28-incubating-SNAPSHOT (the current OAuth 2.0 version core >>> specification hence the one we aim for...) >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? >>>>> >>>>> Please vote. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Antonio >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > [key:62590808] > > >
