Hola Tom, yes that makes perfectly sense - I'll just drop the second layer of parent pom which only contributes to make thing a little confusional (at least by my experience)
thanks and best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simo, > what you propose makes sense, however I think the plans are also to > gradually re-introduce, at least, the spec and signature modules thus I'm > not sure about it. > Cheers, > Tommaso > > 2012/7/3 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> Hi all guys, >> >> since the only module we process ATM is the oath2.0 (and related >> submodules), do you agree I move submodules on top level? Maybe I >> missed some discussions to keep them as they are currently? >> >> Best, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >>
