Well we have some bugs already... e.g. [0] and it would be good to go yet one time more throughout the spec and double check. We might even split the verification part e.g. by paragraphs?
WDYT? A. [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBER-49 On Oct 15, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: I saw the news. It's great. Are there any known gaps in Amber to support the final spec? Thanks, Raymond On Oct 15, 2012, at 2:31 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: FYI Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: October 13, 2012 1:34:01 AM GMT+02:00 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 RFCs Completed The OAuth 2.0 Core and Bearer specifications are now RFC 6749<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.txt> and RFC 6750<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6750.txt>. Thanks to all of you who brought us to this important milestone! I wrote about this at http://self-issued.info/?p=870 and Dick wrote about it athttp://dickhardt.org/2012/10/oauth-2-0/. Now, on to approving the next set of related standards! Thanks all! -- Mike _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
