On Mar 14, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Kevin Bourrillion <kev...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Part of it is the ability to embed a number of statements inside an
> expression (please, at least require curly braces, but still).
Well, we do, look again! The switch as a whole requires the curlies you want.
I'm not being completely flip here. If we feel a need for for more curlies
inside
the existing curlies, I think we may be at risk for this syndrome:
Making new language features #{ Stand Out }
http://gafter.blogspot.com/2017/06/making-new-language-features-stand-out.html
<http://gafter.blogspot.com/2017/06/making-new-language-features-stand-out.html>
— John
