> On Apr 10, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this difference is important.
>
> What about the example below, multiple labels or a fallthrough ?
> switch(x) {
> case 0:
> ;
> case 1:
> }
My request is to call this an example of fallthrough.
I think you're trying to make a point that some forms of switches with
fallthrough behave the same as switches with multiple labels. Sure, that's
fine. I still think it's helpful to talk about the two cases separately, as
distinct features, because the practical use cases are very different.
—Dan
