In line.

> On Sep 30, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore 
> <maurizio.cimadam...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> in general I see where the enhancements are coming from - but I do have some 
> comments.
> 
> One is pedagogical; I think a world where single line strings are denoted by 
> a single double quote, whereas multi line strings are denoted by triple 
> double quotes is a relatively wimple world for the user to grok. This 
> proposal effectively blurs the line between the two variants, as now you can 
> (in the degenerate case where all lines in a text block ends with '\') 
> express a single line string with a text block syntax - which I understand is 
> the part of the goal, but...

And String s = "aa\nbb\ncc\n" is truly single line? I think they are just the 
same thing wearing different clothes.

> 
> The other perplexity is on the use of \s with text blocks; I don't get why 
> the output in your example ends up being:
> 
> red<one space><new line>green<one space><new line>blue<one space><blue line>
> 
> Why is the space at the left of the '\s' being ignored? In fact, '\s' is the 
> _only_ thing you can put in that place that will cause the previous space to 
> be ignored and dropped on the floor, which makes me uncomfortable. I think 
> that, to get the output you want, '\s' should be close to the end of 
> red/green/blue - if, on the other hand, if you add space and _then_ you add a 
> '/s', I don't think we should treat this differently from adding space and 
> then some _random_ character - in which case all the space in between will be 
> preserved.

This is a readability issue in the edits. It's actually 
"red....\ngreen..\nblue...\n". I'll fix.

> 
> Maurizio
> 
> 
> On 30/09/2019 12:45, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> During the discussion on Text Blocks, several of you stated a need for a 
>> line continuation construct. I have since created a CSR to propose the 
>> creation of two new escape sequences: \<line terminator> and \s.
>> 
>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227870
>> 
>> 
>> Please review and comment here.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -- Jim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to