On 2022-02-16T10:49:19 -0500 Brian Goetz <brian.go...@oracle.com> wrote:
> One thing that we have, perhaps surprisingly, *not* gotten feedback on > is forcing all non-legacy switches (legacy type, legacy labels, > statement only) to be exhaustive. I would have thought people would > complain about pattern switches needing to be exhaustive, but no one > has! So either no one has tried it, or we got away with it... > I tried it and liked it. It didn't go unnoticed. :) -- Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com
