we're not reopening this issue now.


Let say we have,

Let's not.

By continuing down this tangent, you're really doing Gavin a disservice here.  Gavin had a narrow, focused, urgent question.  By continuing this thread, he's stalled, and probably sitting on hot coals because we want to get this JEP wrapped up.  And you're reopening old issues with "but you could translate it differently" -- after being reminded that this is an already-litigated issue. This is disruptive.  I shouldn't have to ask twice.

It's possible you have a point,  and I get that it is frustrating to have a point and have no one else get it, but if you want people to get it, I think you need to go about it a different way.

Do you have any response to Gavin's query?

Reply via email to