----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tagir Valeev" <[email protected]>
> To: "amber-dev" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Angelos Bimpoudis" <[email protected]>, "amber-spec-experts"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 2:32:06 PM
> Subject: Re: New candidate JEP: 456: Unnamed Variables and Patterns
> Hello! As we are finalizing this feature, can we squeeze in a little
> improvement? Namely, support enum and patterns within the same case
> label, provided that the patterns do not declare any variables. Like:
>
> enum X {A, B}
>
> static void test(Object obj) {
> switch (obj) {
> case String _, X.B -> System.out.println("B or String");
> default -> System.out.println("other");
> }
> }
>
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> Test.test("ddd");
> Test.test(X.B);
> }
>
> Currently, such a code is not supported. Or will it be considered in
> future JEPs?
This is a nice improvement.
>
> With best regards,
> Tagir Valeev.
regards,
Rémi
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 6:25 PM Mark Reinhold <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> https://openjdk.org/jeps/456
>>
>> Summary: Enhance the Java language with unnamed variables, which
>> can be initialized but not used, and unnamed patterns, which match a
>> record component without stating the component's name or type. Both are
>> denoted by an underscore character, _.
>>
> > - Mark
