Dear ambit

I just thought I would let you know about a new
venture inititated and run by Static in liverpool, in
response to Malcolms comments.

The Static pamphlet has come about to provide a forum
for immediate responses to art and culture and to
hopefully create a place for in depth critical
discussion.

www.static-ops.org/pamphlet.htm

Interesting in relation to the idea of electronic
networks and more intense forms of critique.


Lucy

>Subject: Re: <ambit> what do we want?
>Date: Sun, 22 Jun 03 17:19:33 +0100
>From: Malcolm Dickson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "gair dunlop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>An intention foremost in our minds in doing the last
couple of 
>issues of Matters - I think I can speak here for my
co-editor - was 
>to help generate some discussion around the very
issues you pick up 
>on Gair. The Opinions sections of issues 16 dealt
with art education 
>and the notion of the ideal art school, and the
Opinion section in 
>issue 17, rather mistakenly titled 'Widening the Net'
took the 
>opportunity to get artists viewpoints on what has
inspired them when 
>they have went to events or undertaken projects
abroad, or at least 
>outside of Scotland, which then begs the question as
to whay we lack 
>here to make things a bit more happening. In that
respect it is 
>similar to the intent of the  ambit discussion list
(please also 
>note Iliyana Nedkova's article on 'artist-run
electronic networks', 
>which could also stimulate some more discussion on
this list I 
>think on the issues of terminology around
'artist-run' as distinct 
>from, well, 'not artist-run'). The most pertinent
issues !
>are still discussed in the pub or similar safe social
scenes, but 
>debate is muted in the public sphere and critical
instincts 
>moderated by the demands of career (this is not a
self-righteous 
>accusation, it is a condition applicable to all in
varying degrees, 
>be they curators, gallerists, critics and artists).
>
>I dont think however that its as simple as Gair
identifies:
>
>>  I think there are as ever 2 schools of thinking
which nonetheless 
>>overlap; whether to > create a
>>base where our work can be shared and understood and
displayed within
>>Scotland itself, or whether to go with the pragmatic
flow alluded to 
in Neil
>>Mulhollands' article: that scottish gallerists and
curators being a 
more or
>>less conformist bunch, the way to get ahead at home
is to get around 
abroad.
>>The situation is complicated by the political
retreat from arts 
funding in
>>general.
>
>The grass is always greener on the other side. It is
too easy to say 
>that all gallerists lack risk-taking, as many people,
artists and 
>facilitators have been struggling to get new
approaches recognised, 
>legitimised and supported at a higher level. Whilst I
am constantly 
>frustrated at the seemingly limited aiblity of some 
to look beyond 
>their own axis, there is at the same time a diversity
of practice, 
>depth of engagement, and willingness to experiment
that is in stark 
>contrast to the marginal position of media arts on
the one hand and 
>a critical culture in general.  The absence of a
magazine for the 
>visual arts which can be critically distanced on the
one hand, but 
>partisan on the other has had an effect on practice I
think (which 
>is not to belittle the  key role for Variant in
embracing viewpoints 
>not given a platform anywhere else, but to say we
need more forums 
>through the published medium).
>
>I like Julian Stallabrass' analogy (in Hi Art Lite)
when he talks of 
>criticism and its aim to �map galaxies or
clusters...�  - a good 
>reason for a magazine I think.
>
>The Mulholland article raises more questions for me
about what it is 
>trying to say rather than clarify any emerging
identifiable traits 
>in current art practice... but then is that its
point? Look forward 
>to hearing other people's views on this.
>
>Best
>Malcolm

=====
Web site : www.itchyfingers.org

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------
a m b i t : networking media arts in scotland
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
archive: http://www.mediascot.org/ambit
info: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and write "info ambit" in the message body
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to