Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: <ambit> what do we want? Date: Tue, 24 Jun 03 10:02:04 +0100 From: Malcolm Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Whilst I understand the arguments Leigh puts across regarding of course, I dont necessarily share his position + perspective. Yes, like many, I have an interest in a magazine for Scotland which is not: a. a coffee table tome, b. a validation forum for new orthodoxies, or c. always throwing stones at all and sundry. It's no coincidence either that this has arisen at a time when SAC may be offering a tender for a magazine, the details of which we dont know at present, which is exactly the right time to discuss it on this list. If it can go to the right sources it will be a good thing for the sector and for the framework of publications that already exist, adding more support rather than undermining it. Don't you think Leigh?
Malcolm
ps interested to know where Leigh got his figures from re' Scotinform.
------------------------------------------------- a m b i t : networking media arts in scotland post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] archive: http://www.mediascot.org/ambit info: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and write "info ambit" in the message body -------------------------------------------------
