On 5/21/2024 1:07 PM, Srinivasan Shanmugam wrote:
> This commit fixes a format truncation issue arosed by the snprintf
> function potentially writing more characters into the ring->name buffer
> than it can hold, in the amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring function 
>   
> The issue occurred because the '%d' format specifier could write between
> 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size between 0 and 8, depending on the
> values of xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, and ring->queue. The snprintf
> function could output between 12 and 41 bytes into a destination of size
> 16, leading to potential truncation.  
>   
> To resolve this, the snprintf line was modified to use the '%hhu' format
> specifier for ring->me, ring->pipe, and ring->queue. The '%hhu'
> specifier is used for unsigned char variables and ensures that these
> values are printed as unsigned decimal integers.
> 
> Fixes the below with gcc W=1:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c: In function 
> ‘amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:61: warning: ‘%d’ directive 
> output may be truncated writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 
> between 0 and 8 [-Wformat-truncation=]
>   332 |         snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
>       |                                                             ^~
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:50: note: directive argument in 
> the range [0, 2147483647]
>   332 |         snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
>       |                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:9: note: ‘snprintf’ output 
> between 12 and 41 bytes into a destination of size 16
>   332 |         snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   333 |                  xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);
>       |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Fixes: 345a36c4f1ba ("drm/amdgpu: prefer snprintf over sprintf")
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmu...@amd.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Removed width specifiers %3, %1, typecasting of unsigned char,
>    s/hhd/hhu (Lijo)
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> index 9b7dc61c331d..0f14d4a11441 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
> int xcc_id)
>  
>       ring->eop_gpu_addr = kiq->eop_gpu_addr;
>       ring->no_scheduler = true;
> -     snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> +     snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%hhu.%hhu.%hhu",
>                xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);

Even for xcc_id, the value range expected is < 255. Anyway,

        Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.la...@amd.com>

Thanks,
Lijo

>       r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 1024, irq, AMDGPU_CP_KIQ_IRQ_DRIVER0,
>                            AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_DEFAULT, NULL);

Reply via email to