From: Basavaraj Natikar <basavaraj.nati...@amd.com>
During the initialization sensors may take some time to respond. Hence,
increase the sensor command timeouts in order to obtain status responses
within a maximum timeout.
(Li: backport for s0ix issue, these patches have landed on 6.9)
Co-developed-by: Akshata MukundShetty <akshata.mukundshe...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Akshata MukundShetty <akshata.mukundshe...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <basavaraj.nati...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkos...@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit 333861f4cca6d2c959ca2876587c42767853dccc)
---
drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
index 2530fa98b568..8a4cd793d021 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ static int amd_sfh_wait_response_v2(struct amd_mp2_dev
*mp2, u8 sid, u32 sensor_
{
union cmd_response cmd_resp;
- /* Get response with status within a max of 1600 ms timeout */
+ /* Get response with status within a max of 10 seconds timeout */
if (!readl_poll_timeout(mp2->mmio + AMD_P2C_MSG(0), cmd_resp.resp,
(cmd_resp.response_v2.response == sensor_sts &&
cmd_resp.response_v2.status == 0 && (sid ==
0xff ||
- cmd_resp.response_v2.sensor_id == sid)), 500,
1600000))
+ cmd_resp.response_v2.sensor_id == sid)), 500,
10000000))
return cmd_resp.response_v2.response;
return SENSOR_DISABLED;
--
2.25.1
