Using the previous firmware could lead to problems with
PROTECTED_FENCE_SIGNAL commands, specifically causing register
conflicts between MCU_DBG0 and MCU_DBG1.
The updated firmware versions ensure proper alignment
and unification of the SDMA_SUBOP_PROTECTED_FENCE_SIGNAL value with SDMA 7.x,
resolving these hardware coordination issues
Fixes: 604d44879707 ("drm/amdgpu/sdma6: add ucode version checks for userq
support")
Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zh...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v6_0.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v6_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v6_0.c
index e6d8eddda2bf..db6e41967f12 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v6_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v6_0.c
@@ -1377,7 +1377,7 @@ static int sdma_v6_0_sw_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block
*ip_block)
switch (amdgpu_ip_version(adev, SDMA0_HWIP, 0)) {
case IP_VERSION(6, 0, 0):
- if ((adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 24) &&
!adev->sdma.disable_uq)
+ if ((adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 27) &&
!adev->sdma.disable_uq)
adev->userq_funcs[AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA] = &userq_mes_funcs;
break;
case IP_VERSION(6, 0, 1):
@@ -1385,11 +1385,11 @@ static int sdma_v6_0_sw_init(struct amdgpu_ip_block
*ip_block)
adev->userq_funcs[AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA] = &userq_mes_funcs;
break;
case IP_VERSION(6, 0, 2):
- if ((adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 21) &&
!adev->sdma.disable_uq)
+ if ((adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 23) &&
!adev->sdma.disable_uq)
adev->userq_funcs[AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA] = &userq_mes_funcs;
break;
case IP_VERSION(6, 0, 3):
- if ((adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 25) &&
!adev->sdma.disable_uq)
+ if ((adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 27) &&
!adev->sdma.disable_uq)
adev->userq_funcs[AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA] = &userq_mes_funcs;
break;
case IP_VERSION(6, 1, 0):
--
2.49.0
