Hi Alex,
Would love to but unfortunately I don't have a tahiti_le (or any SI) part to test it on. Cheers, Tom ________________________________ From: Deucher, Alexander Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 10:45 To: 'Tom St Denis'; [email protected] Cc: StDenis, Tom Subject: RE: [PATCH 7/7] drm/amd/amdgpu: Comment out currently unused SI DPM struct > -----Original Message----- > From: amd-gfx [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Tom St Denis > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 12:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: StDenis, Tom > Subject: [PATCH 7/7] drm/amd/amdgpu: Comment out currently unused SI > DPM struct > > The tahiti_le structure is not currently used. Comment it out > to avoid warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <[email protected]> Might be worth assigning this on the Tahiti LE boards to see if it helps with the Tahiti LE bug. Alex > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c > index 7b9debefd64a..92a041755e8e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c > @@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ static const struct si_dte_data dte_data_tahiti = > false > }; > > +#if 0 > static const struct si_dte_data dte_data_tahiti_le = > { > { 0x1E8480, 0x7A1200, 0x2160EC0, 0x3938700, 0 }, > @@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ static const struct si_dte_data dte_data_tahiti_le = > 85, > true > }; > +#endif > > static const struct si_dte_data dte_data_tahiti_pro = > { > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
