NAK, that is clearly an API breakage.

BTW: Why would we want to stop hiding the type?


Am 16.09.2016 um 10:46 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
Oops, turns out I mailed to dri-devel by mistake so resending here.

The following series fixes up libdrm/amdgpu such that to not hide
a pointer type behind a typedef.

Please Review,

Edward O'Callaghan (3):
  [PATCH 1/3] amdgpu: Fix amdgpu_va_handle typedef not to hide pointer
  [PATCH 2/3] amdgpu: Fix amdgpu_semaphore_handle typedef not to hide
  [PATCH 3/3] amdgpu: Fix amdgpu_bo_list_handle typedef not to hide
amd-gfx mailing list

amd-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to