Am 20.09.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Flora Cui:
Does this change make sense?

Yes, exactly. Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <>.

But please be aware that there is at least one other bug I'm currently investigating.


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 20.09.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Flora Cui:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:19:33PM +0800, zhoucm1 wrote:
On 2016年09月20日 17:09, Flora Cui wrote:
Change-Id: I89e9be3d5c96d46655f3a977fb557b20b4d87609
Signed-off-by: Flora Cui <>
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c 
index 262e872..b266cf7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c
@@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ int amdgpu_gtt_mgr_alloc(struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man,
        if (!r) {
                mem->start = node->start;
-               tbo->offset = (tbo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
-                   tbo->bdev->man[tbo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
+               tbo->offset = (mem->start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
+                   tbo->bdev->man[mem->mem_type].gpu_offset;
mem->mem_type seems not set yet as well if I am correct.
IIRC, I feel it's better that tbo->offset is set out of this function after
get_node successfully.

how about change to tbo->bdev->man[TTM_PL_TT].gpu_offset? since
gtt_mgr is for GTT only.
Not 100% correct either.

The problem is that sometimes a GTT MM node will be bound for a BO which is
still in VRAM (e.g. on eviction for example).

So you need to check if (&tbo->mem == mem) and only then update the tbo's


David Zhou

        return r;
amd-gfx mailing list

amd-gfx mailing list

amd-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to