From: Christian König <[email protected]> This only has the effect of scanning the invisible range twice since the topdown flag is given anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c index 6efa8d7..052c1b0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c @@ -128,17 +128,6 @@ static void amdgpu_ttm_placement_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, if (flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS) lpfn = adev->mc.real_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS && - !(flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_CPU_ACCESS_REQUIRED) && - adev->mc.visible_vram_size < adev->mc.real_vram_size) { - places[c].fpfn = visible_pfn; - places[c].lpfn = lpfn; - places[c].flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC | - TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM | - TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN; - c++; - } - places[c].fpfn = 0; places[c].lpfn = lpfn; places[c].flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC | TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | -- 2.5.0 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
