> -----Original Message----- > From: Colin Ian King [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:50 AM > To: Alex Deucher; [email protected] > Cc: Deucher, Alexander; Dan Carpenter > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/powerplay: drop a redundant NULL check > > On 15/11/16 16:47, Alex Deucher wrote: > > Left over from an earlier rev of the patch. > > > > Cc: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > > Cc: Colin King <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c > > index b0c929dd..13f2b705 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c > > @@ -1469,8 +1469,6 @@ static int smu7_get_evv_voltages(struct > pp_hwmgr *hwmgr) > > table_info- > >vddgfx_lookup_table, vv_id, &sclk)) { > > if (phm_cap_enabled(hwmgr- > >platform_descriptor.platformCaps, > > > PHM_PlatformCaps_ClockStretcher)) { > > - if (table_info == NULL) > > - return -EINVAL; > > sclk_table = table_info- > >vdd_dep_on_sclk; > > > > for (j = 1; j < sclk_table->count; j++) > > { > > > > Is there another instance where the table_info == NULL check can be > removed in the if (hwmgr->pp_table_version == PP_TABLE_V0) section of > the function?
I don't think any V0 systems set the clock stretcher cap, but I'm not 100% sure of that so I'd like to leave it for now. Alex > > Colin _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
