On 2017-01-09 11:28 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 January 2017 at 00:29, Andres Rodriguez <andre...@gmail.com> wrote:
This patch is for reference only, as the corresponding kernel change is
still under review.
Obviously one would sync this in a similar fashion to 1/3 but as-is
this is pretty good.
Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <andre...@gmail.com>
---
include/drm/amdgpu_drm.h | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/amdgpu_drm.h b/include/drm/amdgpu_drm.h
index 3961836..2d331ee 100644
--- a/include/drm/amdgpu_drm.h
+++ b/include/drm/amdgpu_drm.h
@@ -160,13 +160,17 @@ union drm_amdgpu_bo_list {
/* unknown cause */
#define AMDGPU_CTX_UNKNOWN_RESET 3
+/* Context priority level */
+#define AMDGPU_CTX_PRIORITY_NORMAL 0
+#define AMDGPU_CTX_PRIORITY_HIGH 1
+
Thanks for this correction.
struct drm_amdgpu_ctx_in {
/** AMDGPU_CTX_OP_* */
__u32 op;
/** For future use, no flags defined so far */
__u32 flags;
__u32 ctx_id;
- __u32 _pad;
+ __u32 priority;
Please don't forget the "check if this doesn't explode on {old,new}
{kernel,userspace} combos" from earlier.
If you haven't already, you might want to mention why its safe in the
commit message of the kernel patch.
I'll make sure to put in the details when I resend the patch. Thankfully
libdrm-amdgpu is pretty sane and always memsets all the ioctl structs
before passing them to the kernel.
Thanks,
Andres
-Emil
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
