Am 11.05.2017 um 07:42 schrieb Huang Rui:
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
---

V1 -> V2:
- park the scheduler thread for each ring to avoid conflict with commands from
   active apps.

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 19ac196..04a63b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -3643,14 +3643,60 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib(struct seq_file *m, 
void *data)
        return 0;
  }
+static int amdgpu_ring_tests(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+{
+       unsigned i;
+       int r = 0;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; ++i) {
+               struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
+
+               if (!ring || !ring->ready || !ring->sched.thread)
+                       continue;
+
+               /* hold on the scheduler */
+               kthread_park(ring->sched.thread);
+
+               r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring);
+               if (r) {
+                       ring->ready = false;

Don't mess with the ready flag here.

+                       DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: failed to test ring %d (%d).\n",
+                                 i, r);
+               }
+
+               /* go on the scheduler */
+               kthread_unpark(ring->sched.thread);
+       }
+
+       return r;
+}
+
+static int amdgpu_debugfs_test_ring(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
+{
+       struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private;
+       struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
+       struct amdgpu_device *adev = dev->dev_private;
+       int r = 0;
+
+       seq_printf(m, "run ring test:\n");
+       r = amdgpu_ring_tests(adev);

Why a separate function for this?

Additional to that I agree with Dave that when we have the IB test the ring test is not necessary any more.

We just do this on boot/resume separately to be able to narrow down problems faster when we see in the logs that one fails but the other succeeds.

Christian.

+       if (r)
+               seq_printf(m, "ring tests failed (%d).\n", r);
+       else
+               seq_printf(m, "ring tests passed.\n");
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
  static const struct drm_info_list amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_ring_list[] = {
-       {"amdgpu_test_ib", &amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib}
+       {"amdgpu_test_ib", &amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib},
+       {"amdgpu_test_ring", &amdgpu_debugfs_test_ring}
  };
static int amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
  {
        return amdgpu_debugfs_add_files(adev,
-                                       amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_ring_list, 1);
+                                       amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_ring_list, 2);
  }
int amdgpu_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor)


_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to