On 30/05/17 02:18 AM, Christian König wrote: > Am 29.05.2017 um 11:20 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> From: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> >> >> The default option value didn't match the help text and intention. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> > > I'm still unsure about the last one. The feature parity is a good > argument but on the other hand we want people to use amdgpu for CIK > these days, don't we?
We want to make it easy for people to test amdgpu on CIK, which is what the options added by Felix are for. IMO we should not flip the default (upstream) before there is feature parity. > Anyway Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>. Thanks, I assume that applies to the whole series? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
