On 2017-06-05 03:48 PM, Xie, AlexBin wrote:
Hi Andres,
I think the original patch was written by you. Would you comment? Is it a bug
or intentional?
Thank you.
Alex Bin Xie
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:36:59 -0400
From: Tom St Denis <tom.stde...@amd.com>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: amd-gfx Digest, Vol 13, Issue 29
Message-ID: <58773ac0-93a7-e494-d447-88e93ded9...@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 05/06/17 10:24 AM, Xie, AlexBin wrote:
Hi, Tom,
You have found a bug.
Your patch looks fine for me.
Have you confirmed the deleted part is older version? Perhaps search email list
or git history to confirm?
It looks like the edits to the older GFX files (7/8) simply changed that
block of code whereas the gfx9 version they pasted in the fixed block
moving the old block down.
Yeah there was a problem with the rebase here. Tom/Alex's fix on the
mailing list is the intended solution.
Regards,
Andres
Tom
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
