Am 30.06.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Shaoyun Liu:
Change-Id: I87762bfc9903401ac06892bed10efa1767c15025
Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
index a65e76c..06ef893 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
@@ -116,24 +116,33 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_virt_kiq_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
uint32_t reg)
  {
        signed long r;
        uint32_t val;
-       struct dma_fence *f;
        struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
        struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &kiq->ring;
+       unsigned long end_jiffies;
+       uint32_t seq;
+       volatile uint32_t *f;
BUG_ON(!ring->funcs->emit_rreg); spin_lock(&kiq->ring_lock);
        amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
        amdgpu_ring_emit_rreg(ring, reg);
-       amdgpu_fence_emit(ring, &f);
+       f = amdgpu_fence_drv_cpu_addr(ring);
+       *f = 0;

Wow, wait a second. Messing with the fence counter here is a clear no-go. That could even crash the interrupt handler.

You need to add proper wrap around handling instead of setting the value to zero.

+       seq = ++ring->fence_drv.sync_seq;

What I meant with moving the functionality into the fence code was increasing the counter and emitting the fence write.

+       amdgpu_ring_emit_fence(ring, amdgpu_fence_drv_gpu_addr(ring), seq, 0);
        amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
        spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
- r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(f, false, msecs_to_jiffies(MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT));
-       dma_fence_put(f);
-       if (r < 1) {
-               DRM_ERROR("wait for kiq fence error: %ld.\n", r);
-               return ~0;
+       end_jiffies = (MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT * HZ / 1000) + jiffies;
+       while (true) {
+               if (*f >= seq)
+                       break;
+               if (time_after(jiffies, end_jiffies)) {
+                       DRM_ERROR("wait for kiq fence error: %ld.\n", r);
+                       return ~0;
+               }
+               cpu_relax();
        }

That waiting should go into the fence code as well.

Regards,
Christian.

val = adev->wb.wb[adev->virt.reg_val_offs];
@@ -144,23 +153,35 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_virt_kiq_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
uint32_t reg)
  void amdgpu_virt_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t 
v)
  {
        signed long r;
-       struct dma_fence *f;
        struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
        struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &kiq->ring;
+       unsigned long end_jiffies;
+       uint32_t seq;
+       volatile uint32_t *f;
BUG_ON(!ring->funcs->emit_wreg); spin_lock(&kiq->ring_lock);
        amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
        amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, v);
-       amdgpu_fence_emit(ring, &f);
+       f = amdgpu_fence_drv_cpu_addr(ring);
+       *f = 0;
+       seq = ++ring->fence_drv.sync_seq;
+       amdgpu_ring_emit_fence(ring, amdgpu_fence_drv_gpu_addr(ring), seq, 0);
        amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
        spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
- r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(f, false, msecs_to_jiffies(MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT));
-       if (r < 1)
-               DRM_ERROR("wait for kiq fence error: %ld.\n", r);
-       dma_fence_put(f);
+       end_jiffies = (MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT * HZ / 1000) + jiffies;
+       while (true) {
+               if (*f >= seq)
+                       break;
+               if (time_after(jiffies, end_jiffies)) {
+                       DRM_ERROR("wait for kiq fence error: %ld.\n", r);
+                       return;
+               }
+               cpu_relax();
+       }
+
  }
/**


_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to