On 07/14/2017 10:43 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Junwei Zhang
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 6:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Zhang, Jerry
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: add ring_destroy for psp v10

Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.c  | 27
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.h  |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
index 8f4eafc..644941d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static int psp_sw_init(void *handle)
               psp->prep_cmd_buf = psp_v10_0_prep_cmd_buf;
               psp->ring_init = psp_v10_0_ring_init;
               psp->ring_create = psp_v10_0_ring_create;
+             psp->ring_destroy = psp_v10_0_ring_destroy;
               psp->cmd_submit = psp_v10_0_cmd_submit;
               psp->compare_sram_data =
psp_v10_0_compare_sram_data;
               break;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.c
index fb29cd4..b4af32a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.c
@@ -210,6 +210,33 @@ int psp_v10_0_ring_create(struct psp_context *psp,
enum psp_ring_type ring_type)
       return ret;
 }

+int psp_v10_0_ring_destroy(struct psp_context *psp, enum psp_ring_type
ring_type)
+{
+     int ret = 0;
+     struct psp_ring *ring;
+     unsigned int psp_ring_reg = 0;
+     struct amdgpu_device *adev = psp->adev;
+
+     ring = &psp->km_ring;
+
+     /* Write the ring destroy command to C2PMSG_64 */
+     psp_ring_reg = 3 << 16;
+     WREG32_SOC15(MP0, 0, mmMP0_SMN_C2PMSG_64,
psp_ring_reg);
+
+     /* There might be handshake issue with hardware which needs delay
*/
+     mdelay(20);
+
+     /* Wait for response flag (bit 31) in C2PMSG_64 */
+     ret = psp_wait_for(psp, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(MP0, 0,
mmMP0_SMN_C2PMSG_64),
+                        0x80000000, 0x80000000, false);
+
+     if (ring->ring_mem)

You don't have to check if the ring exists.  amdgpu_bo_free_kernel handles NULL 
bos.
With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

Yeah, thanks to reminder that.
I will fix it.

Jerry


+             amdgpu_bo_free_kernel(&adev->firmware.rbuf,
+                                   &ring->ring_mem_mc_addr,
+                                   (void **)&ring->ring_mem);
+     return ret;
+}
+
 int psp_v10_0_cmd_submit(struct psp_context *psp,
                       struct amdgpu_firmware_info *ucode,
                       uint64_t cmd_buf_mc_addr, uint64_t fence_mc_addr,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.h
index 7e9a8cd..e76cde2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v10_0.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ extern int psp_v10_0_ring_init(struct psp_context
*psp,
                             enum psp_ring_type ring_type);
 extern int psp_v10_0_ring_create(struct psp_context *psp,
                                enum psp_ring_type ring_type);
+extern int psp_v10_0_ring_destroy(struct psp_context *psp,
+                               enum psp_ring_type ring_type);
 extern int psp_v10_0_cmd_submit(struct psp_context *psp,
                              struct amdgpu_firmware_info *ucode,
                              uint64_t cmd_buf_mc_addr, uint64_t
fence_mc_addr,
--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to