On 2024-11-05 20:35, Yuan Can wrote:
> In kfd_procfs_show(), the sdma_activity_work_handler is a local variable
> and the sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_work should initialize
> with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() instead of INIT_WORK().
>
> Fixes: 32cb59f31362 ("drm/amdkfd: Track SDMA utilization per process")
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuan...@huawei.com>
Thank you. The patch is
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>
I am submitting it to amd-staging-drm-next.
Regards,
Felix
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index d4aa843aacfd..2792015f1054 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -338,8 +338,8 @@ static ssize_t kfd_procfs_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *attr,
> attr_sdma);
> struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea
> sdma_activity_work_handler;
>
> - INIT_WORK(&sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_work,
> - kfd_sdma_activity_worker);
> +
> INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_work,
> + kfd_sdma_activity_worker);
>
> sdma_activity_work_handler.pdd = pdd;
> sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_counter = 0;
> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ static ssize_t kfd_procfs_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *attr,
> schedule_work(&sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_work);
>
> flush_work(&sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_work);
> +
> destroy_work_on_stack(&sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_work);
>
> return snprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n",
>
> (sdma_activity_work_handler.sdma_activity_counter)/
