Since 2320c9e6a768 ("drm/sched: memset() 'job' in drm_sched_job_init()")
accessing job->base.sched can produce unexpected results as the initialisation
of (*job)->base.sched done in amdgpu_job_alloc is overwritten by the
memset.This commit fixes an issue when a CS would fail validation and would be rejected after job->num_ibs is incremented. In this case, amdgpu_ib_free(ring->adev, ...) will be called, which would crash the machine because the ring value is bogus. To fix this, pass a NULL pointer to amdgpu_ib_free(): we can do this because the device is actually not used in this function. The next commit will remove the ring argument completely. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c index 9b322569255e..9ec8d5a8e48c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ void amdgpu_job_set_resources(struct amdgpu_job *job, struct amdgpu_bo *gds, void amdgpu_job_free_resources(struct amdgpu_job *job) { - struct amdgpu_ring *ring = to_amdgpu_ring(job->base.sched); struct dma_fence *f; unsigned i; @@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ void amdgpu_job_free_resources(struct amdgpu_job *job) f = NULL; for (i = 0; i < job->num_ibs; ++i) - amdgpu_ib_free(ring->adev, &job->ibs[i], f); + amdgpu_ib_free(NULL, &job->ibs[i], f); } static void amdgpu_job_free_cb(struct drm_sched_job *s_job) -- 2.43.0
